The term ‘Innovation Process’ seems almost
like an oxymoron when you first read it. The first question that may hit you is
- Can Innovation really have a Process? Subsequent questions that may come up
would include - What would the steps be making up this process? How can we
measure this process and its results? Can it be replicated across people?
Teams? Companies? Industries? Countries? Cultures?
Sample this - Edison had set himself a goal
of producing “a minor invention every ten days and a big thing every six months
or so”. Over his working lifetime of sixty-one years, Edison actually averaged
eighteen patents annually or one patent every twenty days – not far from the
goal he had set earlier. Besides an inventor, he was also an innovator who was
also successful for commercializing his inventions.
The process Edison used was simply – Try,
Fail, Learn, Try again, Fail again, Learn again, Succeed. To elaborate on the
process, it was actually – Identify Opportunities, Experiment Systematically,
Commercialize the Inventions.
If we shift the context from an individual to
a company, can there be a simple process there too for Innovation? The most
innovative companies in the world in recent times include companies like Apple,
Tesla and Twitter who have achieved multi-billion dollar valuations with
comparatively smaller revenues / assets. Did these companies have an
‘Innovation’ process? They brought in products that rapidly created and changed
global markets, products, technologies and services. Many of these companies
have repeatedly innovated to repeat the process with different offerings.
Cut to a few decades back before the onset of
the ‘knowledge / smart’ economy. Companies like 3M which are very much a part
of the brick and mortar economy but has repeatedly topped lists of most
innovative companies. It still is near
the top of the game where innovation matters.
So is there a secret sauce or recipe common
for both 3M and Apple? What is similar to both companies from different
contexts and industries is that they have come out with revolutionary products
serving unarticulated needs of customers. Simply put, the customer did not
realize he wanted post-its or an iPad. These companies made these products which
became instant successes in brand new categories that the products created from
scratch.
What is common to both is that they may not
necessarily have ‘Innovation Processes’ but both companies are acknowledged to
be the best in providing crucibles and ecosystems to let ideas and innovation
germinate, thrive and survive. It may not be that necessary to have mammoth
R&D budgets or have dedicated teams to show that companies are innovating.
They may also knowingly / unknowingly follow
Edison’s steps in some manner. Here the process translates into –
·
Understand customer needs at the
ideation stage in the beginning (without necessarily going to the customer)
o These stated or unstated needs of the customers can be translated
into ‘Jobs To Be Done’
§ E.g. Customer does not want a drilling machine with a quarter inch
drill bit, all he wants is a quarter inch hole!
·
Test and prove the techno-commercial
viability of the products at the development stage (fail fast may be highly
recommended)
·
Optimize resources for a
successful pilot leading to product commercialization finally
Companies like Google don’t really have
defined processes for Innovation but provide a very conducive environment with
all the right enablers to ensure that people are constantly looking and
creating the next big innovation.
Companies that want
Innovation to be fostered continuously need to provide the right environment,
sounding boards and platforms for the ‘processes of Innovation to be alive and
kicking.
There can be a phase-wise approach for
achieving the above like D4
·
Define (the opportunity)
·
Discover (ideas)
·
Develop (the design)
·
Demonstrate (feasibility and results)
Just like the journey is more important than
the destination, the right process can be more of an enabling ecosystem for
innovation rather than creating innovation as a process.
Ultimately, innovation is all about
“connecting the dots” in new ways that separate you from your competitors—and
we believe there are ways to ingrain innovation in your company by mastering
the arts of dot collecting…and dot connecting. That coupled with systematic
thinking yields unique and creative solutions.
No comments:
Post a Comment